On the 23, October, 2007, Rwanda Independent Media Group (Rimeg) suspended its publications indefinitely.
The evil Rimeg published the only government-critical newspapers in Rwanda : Umuseso and Newsline. Such anti-government trash papers only reinforce my unliberal views that many of you know me for, and lead me to consider even harsher controls on the press. For example, I fully support a recent government request to all government officials to cease placing advertising in the Umuseso. This is a great way to punish those evil journalists, because government advertising makes up a huge part of newspaper revenues in Rwanda.
The patriotic Focus newspaper today said:
"...Rimeg ceased publishing their newspapers because they felt intimidated by the government... . There are those who were taken in by the claims ... such as some gullible members of the public who only ever read the generally spurious content of Umuseso or Newsline .... And of course there are those who are always ready to believe the Umuseso gentlemen because that is what they prefer to do - an example being international media rights organisations such as Reporters Without Borders.
I asked myself, does the [Rimeg reporter's] highly inflated sense of self-importance - no doubt grown from all those years of adulation from international media and human rights groups, diplomats in Kigali and some local readers of his publications - now make him imagine the Head of State is desperate to silence him ... ?" (Quoted from the front page article of today's Focus newspaper.)
Today I add to my personal "Axis of Evil" the following: Reporters Without Borders, international media, human rights groups and Kigali diplomats.
Monday, October 29, 2007
Friday, October 19, 2007
I live an amazing life. I wake up every morning with the feeling that it actually matters whether I go into work or not. I work with people from very different backgrounds. And I work on the front of an economy and country going through radical changes. Sure, there are days when I would rather stay in bed, but there is a clear underlying feeling that I am not just a small cog in the machinery. And I love living in
Africa. Every day I take a few seconds to stand on my terrace and look at the rolling hills of city. Every driving through the lush green countryside overgrown with banana trees and overrun with children makes me feel like I am in the middle of life. The extreme poverty and shocking equality are always present, but they are also a part of what makes this world more real than the comparatively wealthy comfort of Kigali Europe. It is living at the front of the last great battle against poverty, corruption, lies, self-serving arrogance and overpaid consultants. It is also a battle that we are losing because of our inadequacy and our arrogance: Africa is not emerging from poverty. The current style of development assistance destroys local markets and encourages Africans to become more and more dependant on foreign aid handouts.
But this can’t last. The naive hope of the Live8 generation that “more aid is all we need” will slowly fade. The failures of the aid industry are becoming more obvious and more difficult to hide. And it is unfortunate, because aid is not bad per se. For me, there are still brilliant people and great organisations doing amazing work in
Africa. The methods of the aid industry simply need to change, and people back in “the developed world” need to begin to understand the change that is needed, in order to start lobbying for it. For example:
- Don’t give anything for free. Used clothes from
destroy the local textiles market, free American vegetable oil competes with local farmers, free solar power modules put local traders out of business and free money goes to the corrupt and lazy. When you give things for free, you destroy local businesses and livelihoods. Germany
- Use the private sector, even if it means that projects are more difficult. Use local construction companies, hire local companies to implement projects, create joint ventures and public-private partnership, encourage an entrepreneurial mentality. Find ways to deal with the cheats, con-artists and dubious businessmen that leach off donors.
- Stop using cash flow as a way of measuring aid agencies’ performance. Almost all aid agencies have “spending targets” as a way of measuring their “success” in their country programmes. In the aid industry, if you’re not spending, you’re not working. This encourages reckless spending and bizarre behaviour. At the end of the fiscal year for example, many donors will start spending huge amounts of money on products and consultants with little overall strategy.
So the question is, is it worth continuing with the development aid industry?
Yes. If simply because it is better to try and fail than to give up and leave Africa in poverty indefinitely.
But not at any cost. Africa doesn't need more money. And Africa doesn't need more development initiatives from the developed world. We need to be more intelligent about the way in which we do aid. And maybe the best way to do that, is to take a step back and start again with smaller, but carefully monitored projects.
I realise of course that this might mean that less money reaches Africa. But since at the moment, much of the money poured into Africa has a negative effect on the economy, this may just be a good thing.